W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webappsec@w3.org > November 2014

Re: Bug tracking

From: Brad Hill <hillbrad@fb.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2014 23:38:40 +0000
To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>, Frederik Braun <fbraun@mozilla.com>
CC: WebAppSec WG <public-webappsec@w3.org>
Message-ID: <D0868BC1.D37%hillbrad@fb.com>
So, what do editors want to use?  I was leaning towards GitHub for good
integration with commits / PRs, but just saw Mike open a bug in bugzilla
this morning.

As a chair I like tracker because of the IRC integration, and the fact
that everyone with a w3c account who is a member is automatically
enrolled.  But I clearly see its other limitations.

Famous last words - it doesn't seem like too much work to build a GitHub
IRC bot, if that's the tooling we definitely want to use.


On 11/9/14, 9:55 AM, "Anne van Kesteren" <annevk@annevk.nl> wrote:

>On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 2:54 PM, Frederik Braun <fbraun@mozilla.com> wrote:
>> Anne: Is this something we could get with the spec frameworks currently
>> in use (e.g. ReSpec)?

>A&s=851271685c30c8d0c17f94c47d7f25293abadb5275890ca941e1d415adeeab3c has
>links and uses ReSpec I believe.


Received on Monday, 10 November 2014 23:39:07 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 18:54:42 UTC