- From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2014 11:41:18 +0100
- To: Trevor Perrin <trevp@trevp.net>
- Cc: "public-webappsec@w3.org" <public-webappsec@w3.org>
* Trevor Perrin wrote: >2) The "ni://" prefix seems pointless, why not just name the attribute >after the hash algo, i.e. > > sha256="base64..." > > instead of > > integrity="ni://sha256;base64..." Tight coupling has a number of downsides; an example is that implemen- tations can detect the presence of integrity information even when the document uses an unrecognised algorithm. -- Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de Am Badedeich 7 · Telefon: +49(0)160/4415681 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de 25899 Dagebüll · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/
Received on Tuesday, 25 March 2014 10:41:46 UTC