- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2014 18:47:42 +0200
- To: Brad Hill <hillbrad@gmail.com>
- Cc: Joshua Peek <josh@joshpeek.com>, Mike West <mkwst@google.com>, Devdatta Akhawe <dev.akhawe@gmail.com>, Ilya Grigorik <igrigorik@google.com>, Jeffrey Yasskin <jyasskin@google.com>, "public-webappsec@w3.org" <public-webappsec@w3.org>, Jake Archibald <jakearchibald@google.com>, Alex Russell <slightlyoff@google.com>
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 6:35 PM, Brad Hill <hillbrad@gmail.com> wrote: > I think the requirement that service workers be same-origin means that > content sandboxed to a unique origin not being able to load a service > worker is a consequence that just naturally falls out. Elsewhere it was interpreted that the SW resource carrying this header would have this meaning. I agree that it would probably naturally fall out from the page resource carrying this header. (I have not checked the algorithms.) -- http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Tuesday, 29 July 2014 16:48:10 UTC