W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webappsec@w3.org > January 2014

Re: CSP formal objection.

From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 20:52:42 +0100
To: "Hill, Brad" <bhill@paypal.com>
Cc: Mike West <mkwst@chromium.org>, Brian Smith <brian@briansmith.org>, "Anne van Kesteren" <annevk@annevk.nl>, "public-webappsec@w3.org" <public-webappsec@w3.org>
Message-ID: <1nmie9t1a5n7shphgcvhkv1q0kiddk83o0@hive.bjoern.hoehrmann.de>
* Hill, Brad wrote:
>There is also the unfortunate reality that the original text cannot 
>advance beyond Candidate Rec anyway, because no user agent has 
>successfully implemented it. So it is living on borrowed time wrt the 
>W3C process anyway.

You are welcome to demonstrate that no user agent has implemented it, I
have seen no evidence of that; and you are welcome to argue that lack of
implementations should be sufficient reason to remove the text, but that
has nothing to do with the W3C Process. It is entirely normal for W3C
Technical Reports to be advanced beyond Candidate Recommendation status
even if some "SHOULD NOT" requirement has not been widely implemented.
Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de
Am Badedeich 7 · Telefon: +49(0)160/4415681 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de
25899 Dagebüll · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/ 
Received on Wednesday, 29 January 2014 19:53:08 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 14:54:04 UTC