- From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 20:52:42 +0100
- To: "Hill, Brad" <bhill@paypal.com>
- Cc: Mike West <mkwst@chromium.org>, Brian Smith <brian@briansmith.org>, "Anne van Kesteren" <annevk@annevk.nl>, "public-webappsec@w3.org" <public-webappsec@w3.org>
* Hill, Brad wrote: >There is also the unfortunate reality that the original text cannot >advance beyond Candidate Rec anyway, because no user agent has >successfully implemented it. So it is living on borrowed time wrt the >W3C process anyway. You are welcome to demonstrate that no user agent has implemented it, I have seen no evidence of that; and you are welcome to argue that lack of implementations should be sufficient reason to remove the text, but that has nothing to do with the W3C Process. It is entirely normal for W3C Technical Reports to be advanced beyond Candidate Recommendation status even if some "SHOULD NOT" requirement has not been widely implemented. -- Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de Am Badedeich 7 · Telefon: +49(0)160/4415681 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de 25899 Dagebüll · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/
Received on Wednesday, 29 January 2014 19:53:08 UTC