Re: CSP formal objection.

* Hill, Brad wrote:
>I think the removal of the text simply leaves the matter open to each 
>user agent to implement the interactions between CSP and add-ons 
>according to their own best ability and whatever priority of 
>constituencies they already follow.  It neither implies interference nor 

We are all familiar with the fact that removing a requirement leaves the
matter covered by the requirement "open", thank you. That has nothing to
do with what I wrote, though.
Björn Höhrmann · ·
Am Badedeich 7 · Telefon: +49(0)160/4415681 ·
25899 Dagebüll · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · 

Received on Wednesday, 29 January 2014 19:42:24 UTC