W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webappsec@w3.org > January 2014

Re: [integrity]: latency tradeoffs

From: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 16:41:39 -0500
Message-ID: <CAL9PXLyLiYyEkV4E=SbPJHaL0YFTBHKS8W9xCbRhYjoxV98+5Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Michal Zalewski <lcamtuf@coredump.cx>
Cc: Devdatta Akhawe <dev.akhawe@gmail.com>, Joel Weinberger <jww@chromium.org>, Mike West <mkwst@google.com>, "public-webappsec@w3.org" <public-webappsec@w3.org>
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 2:40 PM, Michal Zalewski <lcamtuf@coredump.cx> wrote:
> Oh, interesting. That would have to be very limited, though, right? JS
> is not really designed for that when you can have something like:

I've checked with people who know more than I do.

Blink, at least, will tokenise HTML, build the DOM and render
incrementally. However, neither CSS nor JS is processed incrementally.

Since optimistic fetching is performed based on the HTML tokenisation,
that incremental processing can be quite important.


Received on Wednesday, 15 January 2014 21:42:30 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 18:54:37 UTC