- From: Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com>
- Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 17:54:47 -0700
- To: Mike Pomax Kamermans <pomax@nihongoresources.com>
- Cc: "public-webappsec@w3.org" <public-webappsec@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 25 February 2014 00:55:36 UTC
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 5:33 PM, Mike "Pomax" Kamermans < pomax@nihongoresources.com> wrote: > On 2/24/2014 3:05 PM, Glenn Adams wrote: > > > If we had to rephrase, I'd suggest something like "User agents are >> encouraged to allow users to modify or bypass CSP enforcement, through user >> preferences and/or third-party additions to the user-agent" so that we're >> not tied to specifically bookmarklets and extensions. > > > I could accept this if "encouraged" were changed to "permitted". > > > Hmm, do we have another, less loaded word that we can use here? Permitted > seems to strike the wrong tone (i.e. "we don't want you to, but if you > absolutely must, fine, it is permitted"). What about simply "may": > > "User agents may allow users to modify or bypass CSP enforcement, through > user preferences and/or third-party additions to the user-agent". > That works. [I interpret "may" as IS PERMITTED BUT NOT REQUIRED to do X.] I made this suggested change to avoid the biased term "encouraged", which constitutes a recommendation, and thus is non-neutral. In contrast "may" or "permitted" is neutral in standards speak. > > > - Mike >
Received on Tuesday, 25 February 2014 00:55:36 UTC