Re: referrer directive expressiveness

On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 3:37 PM, Mike West <> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 3:05 PM, Anne van Kesteren <> wrote:
>> "url-unless-downgrade" might make more sense given that description?
> "downgrade" sounds perfect. I'm not thrilled with 'unless', though. I'm not
> sure it's any clearer to specify the "unless" case than the "when" case.

"none-when-downgrade"? That it's full otherwise I guess you'll have to
learn. Just as you have to learn something with the others.

> I guess we could change "origin-when-cross-origin" to
> "url-unless-cross-origin", but I'm not sure how to distinguish between the
> "unless" behavior: "unless-downgrade" sends no referrer.
> "unless-cross-origin" sends origin information. For that reason, I'd prefer
> "none-when-downgrade" and "origin-when-cross-origin", as they specify the
> important differences more clearly.
> All that said, I think I now agree with you that "default" might be better.
> :)

Hah, "default" works for me, though "none-when-downgrade" might be
better as clearly the default might be changing over time. It's not
really an area we've put much effort into so far.

> I agree. The spec (and <meta referrer> before it) notes that user agents
> should feel more than free to limit referrer information in whatever way
> they feel appropriate, regardless of the defined referrer policy.

Okay, I guess that's all good then.


Received on Monday, 10 February 2014 14:47:32 UTC