W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webappsec@w3.org > November 2013

Re: Updated script hash proposal (non spec text)

From: Garrett Robinson <grobinson@mozilla.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2013 14:09:20 -0500
Message-ID: <5293A060.6040104@mozilla.com>
To: Neil Matatall <neilm@twitter.com>
CC: "public-webappsec@w3.org" <public-webappsec@w3.org>
On 11/25/2013 01:24 PM, Neil Matatall wrote:
> Ah yes. Oops. I support the second option as well.
> 
> Should "1*( ALPHA / DIGIT / "+" / "/" / "=" )"  be its own
> symbol/definition/whatever to make it clear that the values will have
> the same rules? 

I was thinking of doing that, but wasn't sure how to write it in the
spec. Can we just call it base64-value?
Received on Monday, 25 November 2013 19:09:48 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 14:54:03 UTC