Re: Updated script hash proposal (non spec text) from Garrett Robinson on 2013-11-25 (public-webappsec@w3.org from November 2013)

From: Garrett Robinson <grobinson@mozilla.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2013 14:09:20 -0500
To: Neil Matatall <neilm@twitter.com>
CC: "public-webappsec@w3.org" <public-webappsec@w3.org>
Message-ID: <5293A060.6040104@mozilla.com>

On 11/25/2013 01:24 PM, Neil Matatall wrote:
> Ah yes. Oops. I support the second option as well.
> 
> Should "1*( ALPHA / DIGIT / "+" / "/" / "=" )"  be its own
> symbol/definition/whatever to make it clear that the values will have
> the same rules? 

I was thinking of doing that, but wasn't sure how to write it in the
spec. Can we just call it base64-value?

Received on Monday, 25 November 2013 19:09:48 UTC