W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webappsec@w3.org > June 2013

Re: policy-uri proposal (ACTION 97)

From: Adam Barth <w3c@adambarth.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2013 21:15:05 -0700
Message-ID: <CAJE5ia9KVeWu8fvB=uSX8nErEZi+oLdhKv7PT2Jppc7i1rX5VQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
Cc: Daniel Veditz <dveditz@mozilla.com>, "public-webappsec@w3.org" <public-webappsec@w3.org>
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 2:38 AM, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 2:34 AM, Adam Barth <w3c@adambarth.com> wrote:
>> I don't think we want to change 1.0 syntax at this point.  We can add
>> report-url as an alias though.
> :-( It seems -uri is also used for the JSON resource. So if we only
> add it as alias it would not solve that, though we could avoid
> introducing more -uri in 1.1 I suppose. It really blows we don't use
> the correct term consistently.

I suspect the issue is that different people have different opinions
about which term is more correct.  :)

Received on Wednesday, 26 June 2013 04:16:05 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 18:54:33 UTC