- From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2013 15:28:49 -0400
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- CC: Adam Barth <w3c@adambarth.com>, Gordon Hemsley <me@gphemsley.org>, WebAppSec WG <public-webappsec@w3.org>
On 6/24/13 1:00 PM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 1:56 AM, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu> wrote: >> Why? Why can we not simply require a type="" here? Actual implementations >> do, so it's not like it's not web-compatible... > > Rebel Opera didn't. I thought there might have been another > implementation that didn't. Certainly no specification that makes that > requirement. Sure. My point is that we have implementations doing both, so neither one is strictly required for web compat. If defining one of these behaviors makes another specification simpler, and if there are no strong reasons for the other behavior, it seems like we might as well make the other specification simpler. -Boris
Received on Monday, 24 June 2013 19:29:20 UTC