- From: Dionysis Zindros <dionyziz@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 10:55:30 -0800
- To: "Hill, Brad" <bhill@paypal.com>
- Cc: Joel Weinberger <jww@google.com>, Garrett Robinson <grobinson@mozilla.com>, Mike West <mkwst@google.com>, "public-webappsec@w3.org" <public-webappsec@w3.org>, Neil Matatall <neilm@twitter.com>, Adam Barth <w3c@adambarth.com>, "Daniel Veditz <dveditz@mozilla. com>" <dveditz@mozilla.com>
You're right, let's remove the "SHOULD" and make this a simple suggestion? On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 6:13 AM, Hill, Brad <bhill@paypal.com> wrote: > >> If the user agent fails to match hash-value, the user agent SHOULD >> report a warning message in the developer console containing the >> actual hash value. > > I don't disagree that this is a good idea, but we usually avoid specifying normative behavior for internal, implementation-dependent details like debugging consoles. We could have a non-normative suggestion or note, but I don't think a RFC 2119 'SHOULD' is appropriate. This isn't something we can or would want to test for interoperability, for example. > > -Brad >
Received on Wednesday, 18 December 2013 18:56:17 UTC