Re: CORS and 304

On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 3:24 PM, Hill, Brad <bhill@paypal.com> wrote:
> We still have the case where the headers indicating validity to the cache may give a longer lifetime than a supplied Access-Control-Max-Age.  In such cases, I would argue that regenerating the Access-Control headers is part of providing correct caching and validity information to the client, and therefore they SHOULD be included with a 304.

Access-Control-Max-Age only applies to OPTIONS responses which I
didn't think could ever be cached?

/ Jonas

Received on Wednesday, 4 December 2013 23:36:58 UTC