Re: CFC: addition of "protocol_handlers" to web manifest

>
> I really like this idea - but is there any evidence that users of the web
> want this?
>

The reaction on Twitter was positive (
https://twitter.com/search?q=url%3Ahttps%3A%2F%2Fweb.dev%2Furl-protocol-handler%2F&src=typed_query&f=live)
and there are 39 stars on the bug (
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1019239), plus some
partners are interested in this (that I can't disclose here). You can check
what we count as developer signals here: https://goo.gle/developer-signals.


> What is the user experience when a user clicks on a link for which they
> don't have a scheme handler?
>

On Chrome, it will do nothing user-visible upon clicking the link and on
the console log an error message (see attachment).