Re: CFC: addition of "protocol_handlers" to web manifest

I really like this idea - but is there any evidence that users of the web
want this?
What is the user experience when a user clicks on a link for which they
don't have a scheme handler?

On Thu, 22 Jul 2021, 10:00 Thomas Steiner, <tomac@google.com> wrote:

> Some more background on this feature:
> https://web.dev/url-protocol-handler/.
>
> On Thu, Jul 22, 2021 at 10:05 AM Marcos Caceres <marcos@marcosc.com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> > On 22 Jul 2021, at 6:01 pm, Anders Rundgren <
>> anders.rundgren.net@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > Are "deep-links" also a part of the Web Manifest?
>>
>> Yes.
>>
>> > Since PaymentRequest doesn't support a "companion API" for payment
>> credential enrollment, "deep-links" have become the de-facto standard for
>> Web2Native integration, also for payments.
>>
>> This is out of scope for this working group.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> Thomas Steiner, PhD—Developer Advocate (https://blog.tomayac.com,
> https://twitter.com/tomayac)
>
> Google Germany GmbH, ABC-Str. 19, 20354 Hamburg, Germany
> Geschäftsführer: Paul Manicle, Halimah DeLaine Prado
> Registergericht und -nummer: Hamburg, HRB 86891
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v2.1.23 (GNU/Linux)
>
>
> iFy0uwAntT0bE3xtRa5AfeCheCkthAtTh3reSabiGbl0ck0fjumBl3DCharaCTersAttH3b0ttom.
> hTtPs://xKcd.cOm/1181/
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>

Received on Thursday, 22 July 2021 09:06:07 UTC