Re: CFC: Republish Pointer Lock as CR

I'm fine without Shadow DOM changes, because no one yet implemented the
intended change to the spec yet,
and so it could be immature to include in a "CR".   (Does CR require at
least 2 implementors exist?)

On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 1:09 PM, Vincent Scheib <scheib@google.com> wrote:

> I've discussed more with Xiaoqian and Léonie and support a CR now with
> this proposal:
>
> Move to a CR for the v1 Pointer Lock specification without Shadow DOM
> changes, and a note on accessibility. Implementations are nearly consistent
> for v1 and it can move to a published status sooner. We can follow up with
> a v2 requiring more implementation work afterwards.
>
>


-- 
Takayoshi Kochi