On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 8:24 PM, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl> wrote: > On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 3:08 AM, /#!/JoePea <trusktr@gmail.com> wrote: > > I really believe that we should be allowed to name our elements with any > > name we wish, and that they should override native elements (that is > future > > proof), and that overriding should be on some type of encapsulated basis > > (for example, override within a shadow root and it won't affect other > code > > outside the shadow root). > > I don't think anyone disagrees with that in principle, but in practice > that would require refactoring huge amounts of code which will > basically not happen anytime soon. Better to iterate in smaller steps. > The implied key point here is that we can relax restrictions in the future, but it's difficult-to-impossible to tighten restrictions. > > -- > https://annevankesteren.nl/ > >
Received on Saturday, 23 April 2016 04:03:09 UTC