- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2016 05:24:42 +0200
- To: "/#!/JoePea" <trusktr@gmail.com>
- Cc: Takayoshi Kochi <kochi@google.com>, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, Nick Dugger <nick.dugger1@gmail.com>, public-webapps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 3:08 AM, /#!/JoePea <trusktr@gmail.com> wrote: > I really believe that we should be allowed to name our elements with any > name we wish, and that they should override native elements (that is future > proof), and that overriding should be on some type of encapsulated basis > (for example, override within a shadow root and it won't affect other code > outside the shadow root). I don't think anyone disagrees with that in principle, but in practice that would require refactoring huge amounts of code which will basically not happen anytime soon. Better to iterate in smaller steps. -- https://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Saturday, 23 April 2016 03:25:06 UTC