RE: Telecon / meeting on first week of April for Web Components

From: Jan Miksovsky [mailto:jan@component.kitchen] 

> As a reminder: the proposed agenda for the meeting is to go through the “needs consensus” items posted at https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues?q=is:issue+is:open+label:"needs+consensus". It sounds like it would be good to resolve pending Shadow DOM issues before tackling Custom Elements issues.

I spent some time organizing these "needs consensus" issues into a category/priority list. Let's try to go in this order (which interleaves SD and CE):

## Definitely needs discussion

* [SD] https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/308: should we use `display: contents`
* [CE] https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/417: caching vs. late binding of lifecycle callbacks

## Discussion would be good; still contentious/tricky

* [SD] https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/477: `document.currentScript` censoring
* [SD] https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/355: use CSS containment features by default
* [CE] https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/186: integrating callback invocation with IDL and editing operations

## New feature proposals

* [CE] https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/468: provide a mechanism for adding default/"UA" styles to a custom element
* [SD] https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/288: `slotchange` event

## Discussion would be good, but there's likely a default consensus based on GitHub discussions so far

* [SD] https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/59: parse `<slot>` like `<template>`
* [Both] https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/449: restrict to secure contexts
* [CE] https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/474: define order for attributeChangedCallback invocations

## Bikeshedding; probably does not need telecom time

* [SD] https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/451: rename getAssignedNodes and assignedSlot
* [CE] https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/434: rename "custom tag" and "type extension"

See you all in a few!

Received on Tuesday, 5 April 2016 16:48:21 UTC