Re: [Web Components] proposing a f2f...

On Fri, 30 Oct 2015 16:21:43 +0900, Domenic Denicola <> wrote:

> Maybe we could have separate meetings (or days) for shadow DOM and for  
> custom elements? I am concerned that with this growing list of shadow  
> DOM topics we will not have time for custom elements, which would be  
> disappointing for those of us traveling specifically for that.

It seems we might have enough work to make this a good idea.

> As for dates: If we go for late January, the 26th through 28th collide  
> with TC39, but the 25th or 29th would be ideal for me, since it would  
> allow travel consolidation. December also works, with no conflicts.

If we go for January, this seems like a good week. I presume Travis will  
be in Australia earlier at the TAG meeting, and I'll be there too.

For people traveling to both, it seems a big ask to split the week.

Would people prefer to have a two-day meeting covering saturday or sunday,  
have one meeting in december and one in january (preferences for which is  
which?), try to have one very long day (personally I strongly advise not  
trying that, but if it's what we get I'll work with it)?

I'll set up a doodle when I get to sit down for a minute, hopefully  
tomorrow. Feel free to add to the thread in the meantime.


> From: "Takayoshi Kochi (河内 隆仁)" <>
> Sent: Oct 30, 2015 2:52 PM
> To: Ryosuke Niwa
> Cc: Cynthia Shelly; Chris Wilson; Travis Leithead; Dimitri Glazkov; Olli  
> Pettay; Chaals McCathie Nevile; public-webapps WG
> Subject: Re: [Web Components] proposing a f2f...
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 3:04 PM, Ryosuke Niwa  
> <<>> wrote:
>> On Oct 29, 2015, at 9:47 AM, Chris Wilson  
>> <<>> wrote:
>> Or host in Seattle.  :)
>> On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 9:20 AM, Travis Leithead  
>> <<>>  
>> wrote:
>>> I would prefer a late January date so as to allow me to arrange  
>>> travel. Otherwise, I’m happy to attend remotely anytime.
> I'm okay with either option with a slight preference on having it  
> earlier since we didn't have much time discussing custom elements at  
> I would like to resolve the following issues for shadow DOM:
> 1. Clarify focus navigation
> 2. Clarify selection behavior (at least make it interoperable to JS)
> 3. Decide on the style cascading order
> In addition, I'd propose
> + Decide on style inheritance  
> (
> And the following issues for custom elements:
> 4. Construction model. Do we do sync / almost-sync / dance?
> 5. Do we support upgrading?  If we do, how?
> Any other issues?
> - R. Niwa
> --
> Takayoshi Kochi

Charles McCathie Nevile - web standards - CTO Office, Yandex - - - Find more at

Received on Monday, 2 November 2015 00:21:58 UTC