W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > October to December 2015

Re: [Web Components] proposing a f2f...

From: Chaals McCathie Nevile <chaals@yandex-team.ru>
Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2015 01:21:19 +0900
To: Takayoshi Kochi (河内 隆仁) <kochi@google.com>, "Ryosuke Niwa" <rniwa@apple.com>, "Domenic Denicola" <d@domenic.me>
Cc: "Cynthia Shelly" <cyns@microsoft.com>, "Chris Wilson" <cwilso@google.com>, "Travis Leithead" <travis.leithead@microsoft.com>, "Dimitri Glazkov" <dglazkov@google.com>, "Olli Pettay" <olli@pettay.fi>, "public-webapps WG" <public-webapps@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.x7f5xtozs7agh9@widsith.local>
On Fri, 30 Oct 2015 16:21:43 +0900, Domenic Denicola <d@domenic.me> wrote:

> Maybe we could have separate meetings (or days) for shadow DOM and for  
> custom elements? I am concerned that with this growing list of shadow  
> DOM topics we will not have time for custom elements, which would be  
> disappointing for those of us traveling specifically for that.

It seems we might have enough work to make this a good idea.

> As for dates: If we go for late January, the 26th through 28th collide  
> with TC39, but the 25th or 29th would be ideal for me, since it would  
> allow travel consolidation. December also works, with no conflicts.

If we go for January, this seems like a good week. I presume Travis will  
be in Australia earlier at the TAG meeting, and I'll be there too.

For people traveling to both, it seems a big ask to split the week.

Would people prefer to have a two-day meeting covering saturday or sunday,  
have one meeting in december and one in january (preferences for which is  
which?), try to have one very long day (personally I strongly advise not  
trying that, but if it's what we get I'll work with it)?

I'll set up a doodle when I get to sit down for a minute, hopefully  
tomorrow. Feel free to add to the thread in the meantime.

cheers

> From: "Takayoshi Kochi (河内 隆仁)" <kochi@google.com>
> Sent: Oct 30, 2015 2:52 PM
> To: Ryosuke Niwa
> Cc: Cynthia Shelly; Chris Wilson; Travis Leithead; Dimitri Glazkov; Olli  
> Pettay; Chaals McCathie Nevile; public-webapps WG
> Subject: Re: [Web Components] proposing a f2f...
>
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 3:04 PM, Ryosuke Niwa  
> <rniwa@apple.com<mailto:rniwa@apple.com>> wrote:
>>
>> On Oct 29, 2015, at 9:47 AM, Chris Wilson  
>> <cwilso@google.com<mailto:cwilso@google.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Or host in Seattle.  :)
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 9:20 AM, Travis Leithead  
>> <travis.leithead@microsoft.com<mailto:travis.leithead@microsoft.com>>  
>> wrote:
>>> I would prefer a late January date so as to allow me to arrange  
>>> travel. Otherwise, I’m happy to attend remotely anytime.
>
> I'm okay with either option with a slight preference on having it  
> earlier since we didn't have much time discussing custom elements at  
> TPAC.
>
> I would like to resolve the following issues for shadow DOM:
> 1. Clarify focus navigation
> 2. Clarify selection behavior (at least make it interoperable to JS)
> 3. Decide on the style cascading order
>
>
> In addition, I'd propose
>
> + Decide on style inheritance  
> (https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/314)
>
>
> And the following issues for custom elements:
> 4. Construction model. Do we do sync / almost-sync / dance?
> 5. Do we support upgrading?  If we do, how?
>
> Any other issues?
>
> - R. Niwa
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Takayoshi Kochi


-- 
Charles McCathie Nevile - web standards - CTO Office, Yandex
  chaals@yandex-team.ru - - - Find more at http://yandex.com
Received on Monday, 2 November 2015 00:21:58 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 18:14:58 UTC