- From: Xiaoqian Wu <xiaoqian@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2015 02:59:17 +0800
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- Cc: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@gmail.com>, Ms2ger <ms2ger@gmail.com>, Webapps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>
> On 22 Sep, 2015, at 1:35 am, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl> wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 6:03 PM, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@gmail.com> wrote: >> On 9/21/15 5:54 AM, Ms2ger wrote: >>> Why? >> >> I think the rationale was mentioned in >> <https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2015JulSep/0367.html>. > > Ms2ger made a valid point. Workers is actively being updated (I > submitted two PRs the other day, more to come). If you don't want to > get out-of-sync you won't get to REC in the foreseeable future. It > therefore is likely a waste of time for someone to volunteer to > copy-and-paste text that is unstable. > Thanks for explaining the situation :) If the spec is still changing frequently, indeed it isn't a good idea to publish another CR… but the WebApps WG needs to clearly tell the community that the 2012 CR should be considered obsolete. I’d suggest that we publish a WD for Workers, which adapts to the current changes and revise the 2012 CR. The community is encouraged to refer to either the WHATWG version or the new WD. — xiaoqian > > -- > https://annevankesteren.nl/ >
Received on Monday, 21 September 2015 18:59:30 UTC