Re: Normative references to Workers. from Daniel Veditz on 2015-09-15 (public-webapps@w3.org from July to September 2015)

From: Daniel Veditz <dveditz@mozilla.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2015 12:26:19 -0700
To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Cc: Mike West <mkwst@google.com>, Webapps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@gmail.com>, Philippe Le Hégaret <plh@w3.org>, Brad Hill <hillbrad@gmail.com>, Alex Russell <slightlyoff@google.com>
Message-ID: <CADYDTCACeD9FyFq+M3rcWttiPHjLsmQzGBECiBrNw9vd++PHBQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 11:25 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
wrote:

> there's nothing wrong with reffing WHATWG specs.  It will not delay
>  or hamper
>
> publication or Rec-track advancement, despite the
>  occasional misinformed
>
> complaint from someone not aware of the
>  
> policies.
>

When the complaint comes from the office of the Director we have to assume
it's going to hamper us whether or not they are misinformed.

-Dan Veditz

Received on Tuesday, 15 September 2015 19:26:47 UTC