- From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2015 07:37:04 -0400
- To: Hallvord Reiar Michaelsen Steen <hsteen@mozilla.com>, Jungkee Song <jungkee.song@samsung.com>, Julian Aubourg <j@ubourg.net>
- CC: WebApps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>
On 8/6/15 8:07 AM, Hallvord Reiar Michaelsen Steen wrote: > On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 9:15 AM, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl > <mailto:annevk@annevk.nl>> wrote: > > According to Art the plan of record is to still pursue > https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/xhr/raw-file/default/xhr-1/Overview.html > > > And you correctly note > > but > that was last updated more than a year ago. Last "formally" published > a year and a half ago. > > > And that is mostly my fault. I intended to keep the W3C fork up to > date (at least up to a point), but at some point I attempted to simply > apply Git patches from Anne's edits to the WHATWG version, and it > turned out Git had problems applying them automatically for whatever > reason - apparently the versions were already so distinct that it > wasn't possible. Since then I haven't found time for doing the manual > cut-and-paste work required, and I therefore think it's probably > better to follow Anne's advice and drop the W3C version entirely in > favour of the WHATWG version. I still like the idea of having a > "stable" spec documenting the interoperable behaviour of XHR by a > given point in time - but I haven't been able to prioritise it and > neither, apparently, have the other two editors. Jungkee, Julian - we would like your input, in particular whether or not you can still commit to helping with the tasks required to move XHR Level 1 along the Recommendation track. Others - if you can commit to helping with the main tasks (editing, testing, implementation, etc.) for XHR L1, please let us know. -Thanks, AB
Received on Friday, 7 August 2015 11:37:33 UTC