- From: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
- Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 11:48:13 -0700
- To: Travis Leithead <travis.leithead@microsoft.com>
- Cc: public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 8:45 AM, Travis Leithead <travis.leithead@microsoft.com> wrote: > Recommendations: > · HTML5 > · Web Messaging > > Other references: > · CSS OM > · Web Sockets > · WebRTC Note that in practice I would think that most implementations return objects which have a .item() function on them. So replacing with just a plain FrozenArray<T> likely would not be web compatible :( We likely need to introduce something like FrozenArrayWithItem<T> which returns a subclass of Array that has a .item function. Or we need to add Array.prototype.item, but that would require convincing TC39 that that's a good idea, and would need testing for web compatibility. / Jonas
Received on Thursday, 16 July 2015 18:49:10 UTC