RE: [editing] Responsive Input Terminology

+1 to device-independent events (di-events...hopefully not become die-events
per the time perspective conversation)



* katie *
 
Katie Haritos-Shea 
Senior Accessibility SME (WCAG/Section 508/ADA/AODA)
 
Cell: 703-371-5545 | ryladog@gmail.com | Oakton, VA | LinkedIn Profile |
Office: 703-371-5545

-----Original Message-----
From: chaals@yandex-team.ru [mailto:chaals@yandex-team.ru] 
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2014 9:36 AM
To: Simon Pieters; Arthur Barstow; Tobie Langel
Cc: Ben Peters; public-editing-tf; public-webapps@w3.org;
public-indie-ui@w3.org; public-html@w3.org
Subject: Re: [editing] Responsive Input Terminology

sounds quite reasonable to me.

12.12.2014, 16:41, "Simon Pieters" <simonp@opera.com>:
> On Fri, 12 Dec 2014 13:39:47 +0100, Tobie Langel 
> <tobie.langel@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>  On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 1:00 PM, Arthur Barstow 
>> <art.barstow@gmail.com>
>>  wrote:
>>>  What is your counter-proposal?
>>  Heh.
>>
>>  Fair enough, I guess. :)
>>
>>  These seem related to what Java calls semantic events [JAVADOC], so 
>> I'd
>>  give that a try to see if it fits the model. If not, would "abstract
>>  events" or simply "high-level events" work? Sorry if these have 
>> already
>>  been discussed and dismissed (haven't had much time to look through 
>> the
>>  archives, tbh).
>
> How about "device-independent events"?
>
> --
> Simon Pieters
> Opera Software

--
Charles McCathie Nevile - web standards - CTO Office, Yandex
chaals@yandex-team.ru - - - Find more at http://yandex.com