W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > October to December 2014

Re: [editing] Responsive Input Terminology

From: <chaals@yandex-team.ru>
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 17:35:42 +0300
To: Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@gmail.com>, Tobie Langel <tobie.langel@gmail.com>
Cc: Ben Peters <ben.peters@microsoft.com>, public-editing-tf <public-editing-tf@w3.org>, "public-webapps@w3.org" <public-webapps@w3.org>, "public-indie-ui@w3.org" <public-indie-ui@w3.org>, "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>
Message-Id: <134211418394942@webcorp02f.yandex-team.ru>
sounds quite reasonable to me.

12.12.2014, 16:41, "Simon Pieters" <simonp@opera.com>:
> On Fri, 12 Dec 2014 13:39:47 +0100, Tobie Langel <tobie.langel@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>> šOn Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 1:00 PM, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@gmail.com>
>> šwrote:
>>> šWhat is your counter-proposal?
>> šHeh.
>>
>> šFair enough, I guess. :)
>>
>> šThese seem related to what Java calls semantic events [JAVADOC], so I'd
>> šgive that a try to see if it fits the model. If not, would "abstract
>> ševents" or simply "high-level events" work? Sorry if these have already
>> šbeen discussed and dismissed (haven't had much time to look through the
>> šarchives, tbh).
>
> How about "device-independent events"?
>
> --
> Simon Pieters
> Opera Software

--
Charles McCathie Nevile - web standards - CTO Office, Yandex
chaals@yandex-team.ru - - - Find more at http://yandex.com
Received on Friday, 12 December 2014 14:36:21 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 18:14:32 UTC