- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2014 15:40:14 +0100
- To: Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>
- Cc: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>, WebApps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 3:02 PM, Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org> wrote: > Another option would be to define only the syntax and leave the bindings to > v2 only, but it wouldn't help much for testing. Well we don't want to test something known to be wrong (e.g. sequence). And we want to retain the ability to make changes to the IDL syntax as we discover problems with it. -- https://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Wednesday, 3 December 2014 14:40:44 UTC