W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > October to December 2014

Re: CfC: publish WG Note of UI Events; deadline November 14

From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 09:44:50 -0500
Message-ID: <546CACE2.60507@gmail.com>
To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>, Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>, Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>
CC: Travis Leithead <travis.leithead@microsoft.com>, "Gary Kacmarcik (Кошмарчик)" <garykac@chromium.org>, public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>, "www-dom@w3.org" <www-dom@w3.org>
On 11/19/14 9:35 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 3:20 PM, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Although there appears to be agreement that work on the [uievents] spec
>> should stop, the various replies raise sufficient questions that I consider
>> this CfC (as written) as failed.
>>
>> Travis, Gary - would you please make a specific proposal for these two
>> specs? In particular, what is the title and shortname for each document, and
>> which spec/shortname becomes the WG Note?
>>
>> After we have agreed on a way forward, I'll start a new CfC.
>>
>> (I believe the Principle of Least Surprise here means considering specs that
>> currently reference [uievents] or [DOM-Level-3-Events]. F.ex., I suppose a
>> document titled "UI Events" with a shortname of DOM-Level-3-Events could be
>> a bit confusing to some, although strictly speaking could be done.)
> My proposal would be to update UI Events with the latest editor's
> draft of DOM Level 3 Events (title renamed, of course) and have the
> DOM Level 3 Events URL redirect to UI Events. That would communicate
> clearly what happened.

Yves, Philippe - can Anne's proposal be done?
Received on Wednesday, 19 November 2014 14:44:37 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 18:14:32 UTC