W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > October to December 2014

Re: CfC: publish WG Note of UI Events; deadline November 14

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 15:35:22 +0100
Message-ID: <CADnb78jjEYxHwGeV_59zum_=+6aJVNv82TwWcpMm4WKUK=7+7Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@gmail.com>
Cc: Travis Leithead <travis.leithead@microsoft.com>, Gary Kacmarcik (Кошмарчик) <garykac@chromium.org>, public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>, "www-dom@w3.org" <www-dom@w3.org>
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 3:20 PM, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@gmail.com> wrote:
> Although there appears to be agreement that work on the [uievents] spec
> should stop, the various replies raise sufficient questions that I consider
> this CfC (as written) as failed.
> Travis, Gary - would you please make a specific proposal for these two
> specs? In particular, what is the title and shortname for each document, and
> which spec/shortname becomes the WG Note?
> After we have agreed on a way forward, I'll start a new CfC.
> (I believe the Principle of Least Surprise here means considering specs that
> currently reference [uievents] or [DOM-Level-3-Events]. F.ex., I suppose a
> document titled "UI Events" with a shortname of DOM-Level-3-Events could be
> a bit confusing to some, although strictly speaking could be done.)

My proposal would be to update UI Events with the latest editor's
draft of DOM Level 3 Events (title renamed, of course) and have the
DOM Level 3 Events URL redirect to UI Events. That would communicate
clearly what happened.

Received on Wednesday, 19 November 2014 14:35:55 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 18:14:32 UTC