- From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 07:18:25 -0400
- To: Michael Cooper <cooper@w3.org>
- CC: public-webapps@w3.org, WAI Liaison <wai-liaison@w3.org>
On 9/4/14 8:51 AM, Arthur Barstow wrote: > Hi Michael, All, > > Thanks for your e-mail. I'm _really_ sorry for the delayed reply [this > email was accidentally moved to my "Back Burner" folder where I just > noticed it)! > > Although I will check all of WebApps' specs and ask Editors to update > their documents accordingly, are there any specs that are of high/keen > interest to you? (WebApps' spec list is > <https://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/wiki/PubStatus>.) Hi Michael, All, Yves and Cindy agreed to take the lead to followup on your request. My expectation is they will check all of WebApps' specs and if/when a spec could be improved, they will file a Bug/Issue accordingly. Again, if you and/or your colleagues have specific specs that concern you, please do let us know. -Thanks, Art > On 6/20/14 10:33 AM, Michael Cooper wrote: >> The WAI Protocols and Formats Working Group has looked at a number of >> specifications published by the Web Applications Working Group >> recently. Our process is to note the publication of documents and >> take a quick look to determine if they need a closer review. However, >> many of the documents we have looked at recently have extremely brief >> abstracts, and no introductions. This makes it very difficult for us >> to figure out the nature of the specification, and in turn to >> determine what our interest in it might be. >> >> We request that you add more complete abstracts to the >> specifications, to provide a high-level but more complete idea of >> what the specification does. We also request that you add >> introduction sections to the specifications, to explain what problem >> the technology solves and how (in general terms) it addresses that. >> We think this will aid our own review and will also greatly help >> other reviewers to make useful comments. >> >> Michael Cooper >> PFWG staff contact >> >
Received on Tuesday, 30 September 2014 11:18:56 UTC