W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > July to September 2014

Re: PFWG request for abstract and introductions

From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 07:18:25 -0400
Message-ID: <542A9181.9000502@gmail.com>
To: Michael Cooper <cooper@w3.org>
CC: public-webapps@w3.org, WAI Liaison <wai-liaison@w3.org>
On 9/4/14 8:51 AM, Arthur Barstow wrote:
> Hi Michael, All,
> Thanks for your e-mail. I'm _really_ sorry for the delayed reply [this 
> email was accidentally moved to my "Back Burner" folder where I just 
> noticed it)!
> Although I will check all of WebApps' specs and ask Editors to update 
> their documents accordingly, are there any specs that are of high/keen 
> interest to you? (WebApps' spec list is 
> <https://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/wiki/PubStatus>.)

Hi Michael, All,

Yves and Cindy agreed to take the lead to followup on your request. My 
expectation is they will check all of WebApps' specs and if/when a spec 
could be improved, they will file a Bug/Issue accordingly.

Again, if you and/or your colleagues have specific specs that concern 
you, please do let us know.

-Thanks, Art

> On 6/20/14 10:33 AM, Michael Cooper wrote:
>> The WAI Protocols and Formats Working Group has looked at a number of 
>> specifications published by the Web Applications Working Group 
>> recently. Our process is to note the publication of documents and 
>> take a quick look to determine if they need a closer review. However, 
>> many of the documents we have looked at recently have extremely brief 
>> abstracts, and no introductions. This makes it very difficult for us 
>> to figure out the nature of the specification, and in turn to 
>> determine what our interest in it might be.
>> We request that you add more complete abstracts to the 
>> specifications, to provide a high-level but more complete idea of 
>> what the specification does. We also request that you add 
>> introduction sections to the specifications, to explain what problem 
>> the technology solves and how (in general terms) it addresses that. 
>> We think this will aid our own review and will also greatly help 
>> other reviewers to make useful comments.
>> Michael Cooper
>> PFWG staff contact
Received on Tuesday, 30 September 2014 11:18:56 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 18:14:27 UTC