- From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2014 08:51:11 -0400
- To: Michael Cooper <cooper@w3.org>
- CC: public-webapps@w3.org, WAI Liaison <wai-liaison@w3.org>
Hi Michael, All, Thanks for your e-mail. I'm _really_ sorry for the delayed reply [this email was accidentally moved to my "Back Burner" folder where I just noticed it)! Although I will check all of WebApps' specs and ask Editors to update their documents accordingly, are there any specs that are of high/keen interest to you? (WebApps' spec list is <https://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/wiki/PubStatus>.) -Thanks, ArtB On 6/20/14 10:33 AM, Michael Cooper wrote: > The WAI Protocols and Formats Working Group has looked at a number of > specifications published by the Web Applications Working Group > recently. Our process is to note the publication of documents and take > a quick look to determine if they need a closer review. However, many > of the documents we have looked at recently have extremely brief > abstracts, and no introductions. This makes it very difficult for us > to figure out the nature of the specification, and in turn to > determine what our interest in it might be. > > We request that you add more complete abstracts to the specifications, > to provide a high-level but more complete idea of what the > specification does. We also request that you add introduction sections > to the specifications, to explain what problem the technology solves > and how (in general terms) it addresses that. We think this will aid > our own review and will also greatly help other reviewers to make > useful comments. > > Michael Cooper > PFWG staff contact >
Received on Thursday, 4 September 2014 12:51:38 UTC