Publishing an FPWD sounds reasonable. On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 9:52 PM, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Ryosuke, Ben, Kenji, All, > > I'm looking for feedback about moving the Selection API [ED] to First > Public Working Draft (FPWD) ... > > A `rule of thumb` I generally use when considering if a spec is ready for > a FPWD is if the feature set is mostly complete although there is no > expectation all features are fleshed out in detail (IOW, looking for > breadth mostly complete but not depth). The breadth question is important > because a FPWD is also used as an "attorney snapshot" vis-à-vis the [PP]. > Regarding the spec's open [Issues], there is no expectation a FPWD be > bug/issue free (in fact, it would be rare if that was the case). > > What are your thoughts about publishing a FPWD? Do you consider the latest > ED to be feature complete; and if not, what major features are missing? > > -Thanks, AB > > [ED] http://w3c.github.io/selection-api/ > [Issues] https://github.com/w3c/selection-api/issues > [PP] http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Patent-Policy/ > > -- Kenji BAHEUX Product Manager - Chrome Google Japan
Received on Friday, 26 September 2014 08:45:40 UTC