W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > July to September 2014

Re: [selection-api] Moving toward First Public Working Draft

From: Kenji Baheux <kenjibaheux@google.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2014 17:44:53 +0900
Message-ID: <CADWWn7XKkF5oZCpeZVWY=4FHbMy-1ddr00GUfkGhJ90QvhQ6SA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@gmail.com>
Cc: public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>, Ryosuke Niwa <rniwa@apple.com>, Ben Peters <Ben.Peters@microsoft.com>
Publishing an FPWD sounds reasonable.

On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 9:52 PM, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@gmail.com>

> Hi Ryosuke, Ben, Kenji, All,
> I'm looking for feedback about moving the Selection API [ED] to First
> Public Working Draft (FPWD) ...
> A `rule of thumb` I generally use when considering if a spec is ready for
> a FPWD is if the feature set is mostly complete although there is no
> expectation all features are fleshed out in detail (IOW, looking for
> breadth mostly complete but not depth). The breadth question is important
> because a FPWD is also used as an "attorney snapshot" vis-à-vis the [PP].
> Regarding the spec's open [Issues], there is no expectation a FPWD be
> bug/issue free (in fact, it would be rare if that was the case).
> What are your thoughts about publishing a FPWD? Do you consider the latest
> ED to be feature complete; and if not, what major features are missing?
> -Thanks, AB
> [ED] http://w3c.github.io/selection-api/
> [Issues] https://github.com/w3c/selection-api/issues
> [PP] http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Patent-Policy/

Product Manager - Chrome
Google Japan
Received on Friday, 26 September 2014 08:45:40 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 18:14:27 UTC