- From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2014 07:52:48 -0400
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>, Mounir Lamouri <mounir@lamouri.fr>, Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>
- CC: public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
On 9/25/14 6:36 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > It effectively comes down to the fact that the specification describes > something, but Chrome implements it in another way per how I suggested > it should work (using "animation frame tasks"). So this appears to be [Issue-40] and I think a one-line summary is the Editors consider this something that can be deferred to the next version and Anne considers it something that should be addressed before LC is published. Vis-a-vis this CfC, it seems the main options are: 1. Continue to work on this issue with the goal of getting broader consensus on the resolution 2. Publish the LC "as is" 3. Publish the LC "as is" but explicitly highlight this Issue and ask for Implementer/Developer feedback 4. Other options? Of course, I'd like to hear from others but I tend to think we should first try #1 (especially since Anne indicates the spec and at least one implementations are currently not aligned). Mounir, Marcos - would you please work with Anne on a mutually agreeable solution? -ArtB [Issue-40] https://github.com/w3c/screen-orientation/issues/40
Received on Thursday, 25 September 2014 11:53:20 UTC