On 04/09/14 14:31, James M. Greene wrote: >> The sole reason for these sync > XHRs, if you recall the OP, is to pull in libraries that are only >> referenced deep in a call stack, so as to avoid having to include >> *all* the libraries in the initial download. > > If that is true, wouldn't it better for him to switch over to ES6 Module > imports and an appropriate transpiler, for now? > > I'm a bit confused as to why it doesn't appear this idea was ever mentioned. > I believe it's simply because ES6 Modules are not fully implemented in browsers yet. But yes, with the timescale discussed, I agree that ES6 Modules are certainly the best long-term choice for this specific use case. Cheers, David -- David Rajchenbach-Teller, PhD Performance Team, Mozilla
Received on Thursday, 4 September 2014 12:42:33 UTC