- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 06:13:13 +0000
- To: public-webapps@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=26033 Hayato Ito <hayato@chromium.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #10 from Hayato Ito <hayato@chromium.org> --- Thank you. Let me close this bug. Go with plan A. (In reply to William Chen from comment #9) > Let's go with plan A and bring back shadow as a function call. The spec > shouldn't have been reverted in the first place for chromium implementation > difficulty of a feature that was eventually going to be implemented. > > The only reason my proposal exists is because it's probably easier to update > the chromium implementation to match my proposal. Right now, I would like to > see either plan A or plan B go into effect and have implementations match as > soon as possible because they are both better than what we have right now > with regards to moving forward. It's important this this gets fixed soon so > that developers have less time to depend on semantics that are going to > break. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 2 September 2014 06:13:14 UTC