W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > July to September 2014

Re: Screen Orientation Feedback

From: Rich Tibbett <richt@opera.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2014 10:38:54 +0200
Message-ID: <CAAsrAZAb53pB_F1iWAwCdb3LDCtVO549X=jBkG_LkfYQVvd+gw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
Cc: Mounir Lamouri <mounir@lamouri.fr>, Webapps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>, Tim Volodine <timvolodine@google.com>
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 9:59 PM, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 5:35 AM, Rich Tibbett <richt@opera.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 11:33 PM, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc> wrote:
>>> I'm not arguing that we remove the relative angle that's in the spec
>>> right now. I'm arguing that for device orientation events, we should
>>> provide coordinates relative to the screen as well.
>>
>> This topic was filed as an issue against the DeviceOrientation spec in
>> March (https://github.com/w3c/deviceorientation/issues/4).
>>
>> Interest from implementers is a strong indicator to proceed with such
>> spec additions. Active implementer engagement around spec
>> clarifications and additions is quite low right now.
>
> Cool, if we can have this added to an updated DeviceOrientation spec
> then that's definitely the best solution here.
>
> Though the issue above seems to suggest that the spec would define
> that the existing alpha/beta/gamma properties would be redefined to be
> screen-relative rather than device relative. Is that really going to
> be web compatible?
>
> I don't think mozilla would feel comfortable leading with such a
> change given our limited influence for mobile content. But if browsers
> with bigger mobile marketshare make such a change we'd definitely
> follow. Do you have any indication that there's interest in that?
>
> A safer option seems to be to introduce
> screenAlpha/screenBeta/screenGamma (or something similarly named) and
> make those relative to the screen.

Sounds good to me.

> That is something that I'm fairly sure I can make happen in Gecko.

OK. I believe we could implement these properties in Chromium based on
this intent (pending following the correct process there of course).

Do you have any thoughts on providing screen-adjusted devicemotion
event data also (i.e. acceleration, accelerationIncludingGravity,
rotationRate) or do you plan to just stick to providing
screen-adjusted deviceorientation event data for now?

- Rich

>
> / Jonas
Received on Wednesday, 13 August 2014 08:39:22 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 18:14:26 UTC