- From: David Bruant <bruant.d@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2014 21:06:14 +0200
- To: Brendan Eich <brendan@secure.meer.net>
- CC: Brian Kardell <bkardell@gmail.com>, Glenn Maynard <glenn@zewt.org>, adelespinasse@gmail.com, public-webapps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>
Le 12/08/2014 20:51, Brendan Eich a écrit : > David Bruant wrote: >> That's not what I had understood. So both types of APIs (sync and >> async) will be available to workers for say, IndexedDB? >> If that's the case, I have no problem with it and we can stop the >> discussion. >> What I remembered of the state of the consensus was that given sync >> APIs were considered needed in workers, they would be added to >> workers without the async counterpart (since that would duplicate the >> API surface). > > Sorry I missed this -- do you have a link to the thread? I proposed exposing both here http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2013OctDec/0164.html Jonas Sicking wasn't sold http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2013OctDec/0165.html And I haven't found later replies on this topic. David
Received on Tuesday, 12 August 2014 19:06:47 UTC