- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2014 08:32:04 +0200
- To: Glenn Maynard <glenn@zewt.org>
- Cc: Arun Ranganathan <arun@mozilla.com>, Web Applications Working Group WG <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 1:13 AM, Glenn Maynard <glenn@zewt.org> wrote: > Why would the identifier not just be the blob URL itself? The spec > currently makes the identifier just the scheme data, which seems much more > complex than it needs to be. revokeObjectURL should simply be "Remove the > entry from the Blob URL Store for URL." If we want to allow revoking URLs > that have a fragment attached it'd still need to strip it off; Firefox does > this, but Chrome doesn't. That works for me. That way we can make this a more generic store if god forbid we get more of these schemes. > Also, both Chrome and Firefox treat the entire URL as case-sensitive, eg. > "Blob:..." won't revoke the URL, or uppercasing the hostname portion in > Chrome. Using the whole URL as the identifier makes this easy to do. Ew, but okay I guess. > "Subsequent attempts to dereference url must return a network error" should > be removed. That should already be the consequence of unregistering the > URL, so this is a redundant requirement. Agreed. -- http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Tuesday, 1 July 2014 06:32:32 UTC