Re: [webcomponents] Encapsulation and defaulting to open vs closed (was in www-style) from Tab Atkins Jr. on 2014-03-17 (public-webapps@w3.org from January to March 2014)

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2014 10:31:44 -0700
To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
Cc: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>, WebApps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CAAWBYDCyBOEYA9EPOwzLdv1oqTJS_oP3QiGDc8qv2_DX1KRJBA@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 9:08 AM, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 2:34 PM, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu> wrote:
>> On 2/13/14 5:35 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
>>>
>>> Also, Type 2 can be used for built-in elements
>>
>> Built-in elements need Type 4.
>
> Well, Chrome does not have Type 4, yet is implementing parts of the
> their elements using shadow DOM constructs. So clearly something is
> possible with the current design.

We enforce that through C++ magic right now.  There's a lot of details
to figure out before it's something that can be exposed to JS.

~TJ

Received on Monday, 17 March 2014 17:32:31 UTC