W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > January to March 2014

Re: [push-api] Dependency on "System Messages"

From: Michael van Ouwerkerk <mvanouwerkerk@google.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 11:53:59 +0000
Message-ID: <CAF40kP7HaYYEh=mBiajpTu0vv=YSNtiCcbzXMj2aS_X1HEdP3w@mail.gmail.com>
To: "SULLIVAN, BRYAN L" <bs3131@att.com>
Cc: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>, public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
In Blink/Chrome we are looking into the Push API. We intend to use Service
Workers as an alternative for System Messages. The idea is to fire an event
in the SW when a push message is received. This has a big advantage: waking
up a SW should be much faster than loading the whole document.



On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 11:45 AM, SULLIVAN, BRYAN L <bs3131@att.com> wrote:

>  One of the other changes in progress is to include service workers on
> the design of the API. I don't know if that replaces system messages in
> total but the necessary changes will be considered when a new draft is
> submitted.
> Thanks,
> Bryan Sullivan
> On Mar 13, 2014, at 12:40 PM, "Arthur Barstow" <art.barstow@nokia.com>
> wrote:
>  Hi Bryan, Eduardo, All,
> While working through the "push notification" versus "push message"
> thread, I noticed Push API directly refers to "System Messages" as defined
> by SysApps' [runtime] spec. Based on the Note at the top of [runtime], it
> appears work on that spec has stopped. As such, what is the plan for the
> Push API spec regarding the dependency on the System Messages feature?
> -Thanks, AB
> [runtime] <http://runtime.sysapps.org/>
Received on Thursday, 13 March 2014 11:54:27 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 18:14:22 UTC