W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > January to March 2014

Re: [Bug 24823] New: [ServiceWorker]: "MAY NOT" is not defined in RFC 2119

From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 19:41:40 +0100
To: Brian Kardell <bkardell@gmail.com>
Cc: bugzilla@jessica.w3.org, public-webapps@w3.org
Message-ID: <o2dsg91sto2sd8a67auul2cm3hdbao3p2k@hive.bjoern.hoehrmann.de>
* Brian Kardell wrote:
>On Feb 26, 2014 1:01 PM, "Bjoern Hoehrmann" <derhoermi@gmx.net> wrote:
>> If an agent "MAY $x" then it also "MAY not $x". It is possible that the
>> author meant "must not" or "should not" in this specific instance, but
>> in general such a reading would be incorrect. If course, specifications
>> should not use constructs like "may not".

>Your use of "should not" and the logic implies that actually they may use
>"may not" they just shouldn't.  Do you mean they may not?

I think that using phrases like "may not" is a bad practise. I think any
"may" in this context is mutually exclusive with "should not".
-- 
Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de
Am Badedeich 7 · Telefon: +49(0)160/4415681 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de
25899 Dagebüll · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/ 
Received on Wednesday, 26 February 2014 18:42:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 18:14:22 UTC