- From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 18:59:31 +0100
- To: bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
- Cc: public-webapps@w3.org
* bugzilla@jessica.w3.org wrote: >The section "Worker Script Caching" uses the term "MAY NOT", which is not >defined in RFC 2119. I'm assuming this is intended to be "MUST NOT" or maybe >"SHOULD NOT". If an agent "MAY $x" then it also "MAY not $x". It is possible that the author meant "must not" or "should not" in this specific instance, but in general such a reading would be incorrect. If course, specifications should not use constructs like "may not". -- Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de Am Badedeich 7 · Telefon: +49(0)160/4415681 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de 25899 Dagebüll · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/
Received on Wednesday, 26 February 2014 18:00:08 UTC