- From: Ryosuke Niwa <rniwa@apple.com>
- Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 18:32:15 -0800
- To: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Cc: "olli@pettay.fi" <olli@pettay.fi>, "public-webapps@w3.org WG" <public-webapps@w3.org>, Erik Arvidsson <arv@google.com>, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
On Feb 11, 2014, at 6:27 PM, Ryosuke Niwa <rniwa@apple.com> wrote: > >> On Feb 11, 2014, at 6:06 PM, Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net> wrote: >> >> * Olli Pettay wrote: >>> We could add some scheduling thing to mutation observers. By default >>> we'd use microtask, since that tends to be good for various performance >>> reasons, but normal tasks or nanotasks could be possible too. > > Right, we need some sort of a switch. I'm not certain if we want to add it as a per-observation option or a global switch when we create an observer. My guy feeling is that we want the latter. It would be weird for some mutation records to be delivered earlier than others to the same observer. s/guy/gut/. Also by “a global switch”, I mean per-MutationObserver object. Not some global switch on window/document. - R. Niwa
Received on Wednesday, 12 February 2014 02:32:44 UTC