- From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 03:06:14 +0100
- To: olli@pettay.fi
- Cc: Ryosuke Niwa <rniwa@apple.com>, "public-webapps@w3.org WG" <public-webapps@w3.org>, Erik Arvidsson <arv@google.com>, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
* Olli Pettay wrote: >We could add some scheduling thing to mutation observers. By default >we'd use microtask, since that tends to be good for various performance >reasons, but normal tasks or nanotasks could be possible too. This sounds like adding a switch that would dynamically invalidate assumptions mutation observers might make, which sounds like a bad idea. Could you elaborate? -- Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de Am Badedeich 7 · Telefon: +49(0)160/4415681 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de 25899 Dagebüll · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/
Received on Wednesday, 12 February 2014 02:06:43 UTC