Re: Extending Mutation Observers to address use cases of

* Olli Pettay wrote:
>We could add some scheduling thing to mutation observers. By default 
>we'd use microtask, since that tends to be good for various performance 
>reasons, but normal tasks or nanotasks could be possible too.

This sounds like adding a switch that would dynamically invalidate
assumptions mutation observers might make, which sounds like a bad
idea. Could you elaborate?
Björn Höhrmann · ·
Am Badedeich 7 · Telefon: +49(0)160/4415681 ·
25899 Dagebüll · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · 

Received on Wednesday, 12 February 2014 02:06:43 UTC