- From: Nick Krempel <ndkrempel@google.com>
- Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 17:16:47 +0000
- To: tlhackque <tlhackque@yahoo.com>
- Cc: public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAGu+aDegxUSUxGfnYraRxRnWEBG8SR22qSBXBrmF7dVWKKURPg@mail.gmail.com>
This sounds nice, but for security reasons cross-origin fetches would not be able to provide these diagnostics unless the fetch got as far as passing the CORS check. On 10 February 2014 12:30, tlhackque <tlhackque@yahoo.com> wrote: > I found myself using XMLHttpRequest in an application where, when things > go wrong, I wanted to provide information to the user. I was unable to do > so. > > Specifically, I POSTed a form with a large file, and specified listeners > for abort and error events (among others) on both the request and upload > targets. I tried disconnecting the network, shutting down the target > webserver, mis-spelling the host name, having the server refuse service and > injecting various other real-world misadventures. > > Although I get the events in several browsers, nothing in the event tells > me what went wrong. And I find nothing in the specification ( > http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/xhr/raw-file/tip/Overview.html - 22-Nov-2013) to > help. > > According to the spec, in the synchronous model, the exception would at > least specify 'NetworkError'. Async, the only thing one gets is the event > type, bytes transfered, and (possibly) total bytes. One can assume if > loaded is zero, no connection was established; otherwise there was a > connection failure, but that's about it. > > It really would be useful - both for debugging and for providing feedback > to users - if the error and abort events provided some detail: > Was the problem: > DNS failure: no server, host has no A(AAAA) record? > Proxy not reachable? > Host not reachable? > SSL certificate expired? > Connection broken? > Aborted by user action? > Aborted by object destruction? > Some supporting detail (e.g. IP address of peer, proxy, etc) would be > helpful too. > > This is not intended to be an exhaustive list. > > While I would discourage client scripts from trying to analyze OS-specific > error codes, some user-actionable clues would be really helpful. 'An error > occurred sending <flilename>' is about the best one can do currently, and > that doesn't give the user - or the helpdesk - much to go on! > > Please consider updating the spec to provide reasonable diagnostics for > network error events. > > -- > This communication may not represent my employer's views, > if any, on the matters discussed. > > > >
Received on Monday, 10 February 2014 17:17:14 UTC