- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 06:09:29 +0000
- To: public-webapps@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24421 Hayato Ito <hayato@chromium.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #6 from Hayato Ito <hayato@chromium.org> --- Yeah, I assumed that Polymer doesn't depend on event dispatching in detached nodes. However, there is still a possibility that Polymer uses distribution result through some APIs, such as getDistributedNodes(), even in detached nodes. In addition that, I've heard that Polyfill does composition even in detached nodes. That might not be intentional and might not be required, however, for the safety and consistency between Polyfill and native Shadow DOM, I've reverted the chromium side patch, https://codereview.chromium.org/133213008/. As for the spec, let me leave the spec as is and close this bug. It might be safer to make the behavior of detached nodes *undefined*. If we can feel we should support distributions even in detached nodes, we can relax this restriction in the future without breaking incompatibility if we leave it *undefined*. Please file a bug for 'Support distributions even for detached nodes' as another issue. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Monday, 10 February 2014 06:09:31 UTC