- From: Goktug Gokdogan <goktug@google.com>
- Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2014 17:50:49 -0800
- To: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>
- Cc: public-webapps@w3.org
Received on Friday, 10 January 2014 01:51:38 UTC
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 5:41 PM, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu> wrote: > On 1/9/14 8:39 PM, Goktug Gokdogan wrote: > >> Is it really part of the plans (i.e. making HTMLElement constructible)? >> > > Ideally, yes. The main problem with making HTMLElement constructible is > this: What tag name should it use when it constructs? If it were not for > that, it would already be constructible, I suspect. > > Can't it be passed by constructor call? > > If it is, is it going to work with some native support from browser? >> > > It would have to, yes. > > -Boris >
Received on Friday, 10 January 2014 01:51:38 UTC