W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > April to June 2014

Re: Pointer Lock Status

From: Vincent Scheib <scheib@google.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2014 11:10:11 -0700
Message-ID: <CAK-EfXkSrL6gphf6PoNGn8h8J1O5_8q-iY46mEFcN3wtdMsYOA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
Cc: Webapps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 4:54 AM, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>wrote:

>
> Given the spec's implementation status today, perhaps it would be "best"
> to postpone new features and to plan for a potential followup spec.
> Regardless, I think it is important to document new and/or additional
> features and requirements beyond what is now specified. The IDB people
> document their feature requests for IDB.Next in [IDB-Features]. Perhaps it
> would be useful to have a similar document for PointerLock.
>
> If you want to document new features/requirements [and I recommend it
> ;-)], besides using a wiki (f.ex. https://www.w3.org/wiki/
> Webapps/PointerLockFeatures), other options include using Bugzilla (I
> think WebIDL uses a "v2" value for the `whiteboard` field) or a document in
> the spec's repo.
>
>
I've created https://www.w3.org/wiki/Webapps/PointerLockFeatures
Received on Friday, 4 April 2014 18:11:08 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 18:14:23 UTC