- From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
- Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2014 07:54:31 -0400
- To: Vincent Scheib <scheib@google.com>, Webapps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>
On 4/3/14 4:38 PM, ext Vincent Scheib wrote: Thanks for this information Vincent! > Additional specification discussion: > Artillery started a discussion "Problems with mouse-edge scrolling and > games" in public-webapps Feb 21 2014 raising the topic of limiting > pointer movement to a rectangular area. This is addressed in the spec > FAQ for why it is postponed from the initial version, and in the > recent thread the result was a call for prototype. I don't have > resources to build it out, though would accept others doing so. If > this was done rapidly and Mozilla was interested in incorporating > changes as well there's the possibility that Pointer Lock spec should > be updated to include clipping. Otherwise, I believe a follow up > specification at a later time is more appropriate, keeping Pointer > Lock narrow and moving to complete the specification. Given the spec's implementation status today, perhaps it would be "best" to postpone new features and to plan for a potential followup spec. Regardless, I think it is important to document new and/or additional features and requirements beyond what is now specified. The IDB people document their feature requests for IDB.Next in [IDB-Features]. Perhaps it would be useful to have a similar document for PointerLock. If you want to document new features/requirements [and I recommend it ;-)], besides using a wiki (f.ex. https://www.w3.org/wiki/Webapps/PointerLockFeatures), other options include using Bugzilla (I think WebIDL uses a "v2" value for the `whiteboard` field) or a document in the spec's repo. (If you want to use a wiki, I'm willing to bootstrap it.) -Thanks, AB [IDB-Features] <http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/wiki/IndexedDatabaseFeatures>
Received on Friday, 4 April 2014 11:55:02 UTC