On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 10:42 PM, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>wrote: > On 12/11/13 6:39 AM, ext Simon Pieters wrote: > >> On Tue, 10 Dec 2013 22:09:38 +0100, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc> >> wrote: >> >> We at Mozilla just finished our implementation of Shared Workers. It >>> will be turned on in the nightly releases starting tomorrow (or maybe >>> thursday) and will hit release on April 29th. >>> >> >> Excellent. >> > > Yes indeed! Indeed! > So if we are only reason we're doing anything here is lack of a 2nd >>> implementation, then we might already be good. >>> >> >> The premise here appears to be that Presto doesn't count. Why? >> >> Presto has been shipping shared workers for 3,5 years now (introduced in >> Opera 10.60). As far as I can tell Presto-based Opera products match the >> definition of "implementation" in the CR exit criteria. >> > > One of the issues here is `missing data`. The first Call for workers Test > Results was sent over a half-year ago and another one a few weeks before > WebApps' Shenzhen meeting. Despite those requests, the workers > implementation report [IR] remains empty. > > Simon - would you please add results for Presto? > > Kinuko - would you please add results for Chrome (as you said you would do > in Shenzhen [Mins])? > Done. > Travis - would you please add results for IE? > > Another issue is that during the related discussion in Shenzhen, I don't > think this new info from Jonas was available. Jonas - can someone please > run the tests on FF Nightly (see [IR] or the test suite [Tests])? > > Depending on the test results, it might make sense to (re)consider if it > still makes sense to create a spec of without shared workers. > > -Thanks, ArtB > > [IR] <http://www.w3.org/wiki/Webapps/Interop/WebWorkers> > [Tests] <http://w3c-test.org/web-platform-tests/master/workers/> > [Mins] <http://www.w3.org/2013/11/12-webapps-minutes.html#item08> > > > >
Received on Thursday, 12 December 2013 14:06:44 UTC